| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:19 pm Post subject: Rankings |
|
|
Right, as the official forums rankings aren't that much use atm (though I've heard that's all going to change in the new version), I've created my own system.
The top 10 players with the most games are automatically in the rankings, and anyone else who's played 10 or more games can ask to be included (PM, not in this thread).
Rankings will hopefully be done weekly, and new people will be added on the next week after they ask me.
Points are awarded as follows:
3 for a win
1 for a draw
0 for a loss
Average Points per match (AvePoint) is equal to the total points divided by total matches played. It should be between 0 and 3.
Rankstat is more complicated and is used as the ranking system, it's the total points multiplied by AvePoint. It is also equal to the total points squared divide by matches played.
Rankings:
1 ) iMD 798
2 ) Divi-Dead 117
3 ) .zest 104
4 ) Sleipnir 66
5 ) Killer 63
6 ) Umbrae 60
7 ) Ragnarok 57
8 ) Leighman 51
9 ) ZombyDragon 48
10) Tiamet 22
11) Ocelot IIX 16
12) Rattuskid 14
13) Cthlolic 12
14) cabal 901 6
15) Trigger 2
Complete Stats:
iMD
102 6 14
122 312 2.55738 797.902
KillerI8I
20 9 47
76 69 0.907895 62.6447
Divi-Dead
23 9 20
52 78 1.5 117
Ocelot IIX
6 4 21
31 22 0.709677 15.6129
Umbrae
11 8 9
28 41 1.46429 60.0357
.zest
18 0 10
28 54 1.92857 104.143
cabal 901
4 1 22
27 13 0.481481 6.25926
Rattuskid
6 0 18
24 18 0.75 13.5
Sleipnir
12 3 8
23 39 1.69565 66.1304
Leighman
9 5 6
20 32 1.6 51.2
Tiamet:
5 3 7
15 18 1.2 21.6
Ragnarok
7 4 0
11 25 2.27273 56.8182
Ctholic
3 2 5
10 11 1.1 12.1
ZombyDragon
8 3 4
15 27 1.8 48.6
Trigger
1 1 8
10 4 0.4 1.6
The statistics are in this format:
Wins Draws Losses
Total Matches Total Points AvePoint Rankstat
The Rankings are arranged by the last statistic, though if this proves to give biased results, it might be changed in the future.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
instantmegadeath
Not on my watch, you son of a church
Level: 101
Position: Registered User
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 990
Kel: 3 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:45 pm |
|
|
Great, I'm not sure if it fair though. For example:
"Ocelot IIX 6/4/21"
"Rattuskid 6/0/18"
I seems to me that Rattus has the better record but your rankings place you higher.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:48 pm |
|
|
That's true, but what else would you suggest?
I've thought of other ways, but they have far more obvious and silly flaws than this one. I'd be happy to consider others.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
instantmegadeath
Not on my watch, you son of a church
Level: 101
Position: Registered User
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 990
Kel: 3 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:36 pm |
|
|
| Ocelot IIX wrote (View Post): | | That's true, but what else would you suggest? |
I'm working on it.
Although it's strange, the formulae I've come up with, no matter how much I seem to tweak them, consistently rank you at the bottom (looking at the top 10 players on the TT statistics page).
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:35 pm |
|
|
| iMD wrote (View Post): | | Ocelot IIX wrote (View Post): | | That's true, but what else would you suggest? |
I'm working on it.
Although it's strange, the formulae I've come up with, no matter how much I seem to tweak them, consistently rank you at the bottom (looking at the top 10 players on the TT statistics page). |
Then frankly they suck, as I have a better win percentage and number than cabal. Rattus and I are approximately equal, but the difference is slight so we switch over depending on the system used. keep me upated.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:59 pm |
|
|
Sorry for the double post, but I need the new topic notifier for the next set of rankings.
1=) iMD 845
2=)Forcystus 113
3=).zest 104
4=)Sleipnir 63
5=)KillerI8I 63
6=)Umbrae 60
7=)Ragnarok 57
8=)Leighman 51
9=)ZombyDragon 49
10=)Tiamet 22
11/\)Rattuskid 17
12\/)Ocelot IIX 15
13=)Ctholhic 12
14=)cabal 901 6
15=)Trigger 2
iMD
107 6 14
127 327 2.5748 841.961
KillerI8I
20 9 47
76 69 0.907895 62.6447
Forcystus
23 9 22
54 78 1.44444 112.667
Ocelot IIX
6 4 22
32 22 0.6875 15.125
Umbrae
11 8 9
28 41 1.46429 60.0357
.zest
18 0 10
28 54 1.92857 104.143
cabal 901
4 1 22
27 13 0.481481 6.25926
Rattuskid
7 0 19
26 21 0.807692 16.9615
Sleipnir
12 3 9
24 39 1.625 63.375
Leighman
9 5 6
20 32 1.6 51.2
Ragnarok
7 4 0
11 25 2.27273 56.8182
ZombyDragon
8 3 4
15 27 1.8 48.6
Trigger
1 1 8
10 4 0.4 1.6
Ctholhic
3 2 5
10 11 1.1 12.1
Tiamet
5 3 7
15 18 1.2 21.6
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Forcystus
Indie Whore
Level: 107
Position: Registered User
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 1933
Kel: 173 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:01 am |
|
|
I lost 4 points, Thats blows....
Its because iMD keeps getting better cards in random games and refuses to play me at non-random
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:51 am |
|
|
Next set, because I won't have access to a PC tomorrow. Only iMD's changed.
1=) iMD 860
2=)Forcystus 113
3=).zest 104
4=)Sleipnir 63
5=)KillerI8I 63
6=)Umbrae 60
7=)Ragnarok 57
8=)Leighman 51
9=)ZombyDragon 49
10=)Tiamet 22
11=)Rattuskid 17
12=)Ocelot IIX 15
13=)Ctholhic 12
14=)cabal 901 6
15=)Trigger 2
iMD
109 6 14
129 333 2.5814 859.605
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Soviet_Deso
Level: 89
Position: Registered User
Joined: 21 Dec 2003
Posts: 445
Kel: 1 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:30 pm |
|
|
i apologize wholeheartedly for my previous post. It really was not the right thing to post at all. Some of you see it as spam and i apologize to you and if i could i'd give you a card and say it with flowers. Again i apologize for i have been foolish
_________________
:: "Fork is stronger then Knife, Knife does one hole, Fork does four..." ::
[CCS] Soviet_Deso |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:56 pm |
|
|
Just delete it rather than apologising.
You're not that bad, you just need more matches (3 isn't enough to judge).
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
.zest
Level: 108
Position: Moderator
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 2185
Kel: 313 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:40 pm |
|
|
Wow, i overlooked this topic somewhat. Nice to see I'm third, though i haven't been playing any recent matches
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ocelot IIX
High ho, Sheffield Wednesday!
Level: 109
Position: Registered User
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2435
Kel: 127 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:19 pm |
|
|
New set of rankings:
1=) iMD 1018.8
2/\) .zest 120.0
3\/) Forcystus 117.2
4=) Sleipnir 63.4
5=) Killer 61.0
6=) Umbrae 60.0
7=) Ragnarok 56.8
8=) Leighman 51.2
9=) ZombyDragon 48.6
10=) Tiamet 21.6
11/\) Ocelot IIX 19.9
12*) The End 007 19.7
13\/) Rattuskid 15.8
14\/) Ctholic 12.1
15*) TotalPrime 6.8
16\/) cabal 901 6.3
17\/) Trigger 1.6
18*) Slye_Fox 0.9
I've added 3 new people to the rankings, and they've hotted up the competition at the lower end of the table.
.zest's overtaken Forcystus, for the first time, though I doubt this is going to go unchallenged.
There's only the middle of the table which is stationary, and the gap between Tiamet and Zombydragon looks unlikely to close...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Forcystus
Indie Whore
Level: 107
Position: Registered User
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 1933
Kel: 173 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:01 pm |
|
|
| Ocelot IIX wrote (View Post): |
.zest's overtaken Forcystus, for the first time, though I doubt this is going to go unchallenged. |
We have a game going, both using our best...I hope I win
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
.zest
Level: 108
Position: Moderator
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 2185
Kel: 313 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 11:28 pm |
|
|
It's a shame i can't use the second Sephiroth i just bought
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Forcystus
Indie Whore
Level: 107
Position: Registered User
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 1933
Kel: 173 [ Donate ]
Online Status: Offline
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:13 am |
|
|
I'll give you Kane for your second Sephiroth
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
